SOOOOO PISSED!!!

Don’t forget to enter into the SATC Movie Tour Contest here!

So I am really angry with Fox and ABC. If you haven’t heard already, they censored the Lane Bryant lingerie ad from their channels. Now don’t I see that Victoria’s Secret Naked ad playing all over the place, but place a fat girl in a bra and some panties and all hell breaks loose.  Do you think the networks were wrong? And can someone tell me the difference between the two ads besides the size of the models.

Victoria’s Secret Ad




Lane Bryant Ad

Jai From The Fat and Skinny

8 comments

  1. I instintly thought of victorias secret when i heard they were banning this commercial. its so sad that they would do that its the same D*** thing Ashley just has a lil extra nothing wrong with that. ok im done lol

  2. Ugh, I heard about this, but hadn't actually seen the ad yet, the Lane Bryant one is nothing (I mean she looks gorgeous and damm sexy, don't get me wrong, but it's so much more PG then Vic's), there's no reason it shouldn't be shown.

  3. Ok lol, first of all I couldn't get over how pretty that model was!-second, I didn't see anything wrong with it, I've seen alot worse in a Carls Jr ad-third, both commercials were great, just play both!

  4. wow… that's just appalling. there is nothing wrong with the lane bryant ad. i'd even go so far as to say that it's a bit tamer than the victoria's secret ad, where the models are kind of writhing around in that overly sexually suggestive way. the model in the lane bryant ad is gorgeous. yes, she definitely has some major boobage going on, but there was nothing inappropriate in the way she looked. she'd be less covered up if she were on a beach.

    i don't at all understand why they would censor it. america, with all it's talk of freedom, can be so hideously repressed sometimes. god forbid they show a woman with large breasts in a bra on tv. it's infuriating.

    Vogue Gone Rogue

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *